Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    APOE e2,e3,e4 APOE 0.05 185 vs 486 Finn Over 100 E4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 8018664
    APOE polymorphism APOE 0.38 0.002 200 (cases) vs 539 Italian >88 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    APOE polymorphism - HP1/2 common polymorphism APOE 0.013 200 (cases) vs 539 (initial) Italian >88 e4-H2 (haplotype) Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    HP1/2 common polymorphism HP 0.05 200 (cases) vs 539 (initial) (initial) Italian >88 Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    APOE e2,e3,e4 APOE 9.24 0.01 224 vs 441 Ashkenazi Jewish 75 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 15621215
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE 0.75 0.005 2307 vs 764 American, Danish Mean age 60.2 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 23040522
    rs2075650 TOMM40 0.70 0.002 2307 vs 764 American, Danish Mean age 60.2 G A Candidate Region/Gene 23040522
    Apo C-I 1>2 Apo C-I 0.05 282 vs 200 British 84+ Apo C-I 2 Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    - APOC1 0.05 282 vs 200 British 84 and over Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    rs3212948 ERCC1 0.1062 288 vs 554 Calabrian 90+, median 92 Candidate Region/Gene 22576335
    APOE polymorphism APOE 0.0001 291 vs 589 Finn Mean age 97.5 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 16487435
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 0.05 297 vs 130 Turkish, Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    APOE e2/e4 APOE 2.00 0.001 300 vs 160 French 100+ e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 8136829
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE 0.0005 318 vs 350 376 vs 506 American, Caucasian Mean age 100,8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 18034366
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90+ apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 ApT4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    APOE4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over High E4 frequency Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    E4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    VNTR DC-SIGNR 0.041 361 vs 342 Chinese >90 non-6/7 genotype 6/7 genotype Candidate Region/Gene 20003397
    rs2075650 APOE 0.71 3.39e-17 403 vs 1670 4149 vs 7582 Dutch mean 94 e4 Genome-Wide Association Study 21418511
    rs2075650 TOMM40 0.53 2.65e-06 403 vs 1670 3746 vs 5912 Dutch Mean age 94 G Genome-Wide Association Study 21418511
    rs2302951 GRWD1 1.51 7.59e-05 403 vs 1670 3746 vs 5912 Dutch Mean age 94 A Genome-Wide Association Study 21418511
    rs3220637 XRCC1 0.0005 430 (case) vs 290 British Mean age 70 16 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    rs1799782 XRCC1 0.658 430 vs 290 British Mean age 70 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue