Denigma

Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):

  • Variant effect: + -
    Longevity‑Associated (39)   No Age Effect (43)  
  • Study type: + -
    ‑ (1)   Candidate Region/Gene (53)   Meta‑Analysis (1)   Complete Mitochondrial Genome (1)   Mitochondrial Haplogroup (31)  
  • Variant type: + -
    Haplotype « 
    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types


    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    e4 APOE 0.35 0.001 729 vs 498 — Japanese 100+ e4 — Candidate Region/Gene 24534555
    Cdx2–GATA haplotypes VDR — 0.05 923 — Dutch Mean age 75.7 GG GA, AA Candidate Region/Gene 21051524
    rs1800591-rs61733139 MTTP — 0.61 197 vs 251 — Dutch Mean age 93.8±3.1 — — Candidate Region/Gene 16611701
    rs1800591-rs61733139 MTTP — 0.46 655 vs 244 — Dutch Mean age 87.5±3.1 — — Meta-Analysis 16611701
    rs1800591-rs61733139 MTTP — 0.93 164 vs 261 — Dutch Mean age 93.8 ± 3.1 — — Candidate Region/Gene 16611701
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.025 (150 m, 74 f) vs (121 m, 320 f) — Ashkenazi Jewish Mean age 75 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 15621215
    rs915179-rs2485662-rs4641-rs1468772 LMNA 1.56 2.5e-05 873 vs 443 New England Centenarian Study (NECS) (N = 738), (ii) the Southern Italian Centenarian Study (SICS) (N = 905), (iii) France (N = 1103), and (iv) the Einstein Ashkenazi Longevity Study (N = 702) American, Caucasian Mean age 101.5 — GTCT Candidate Region/Gene 22340368
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90+ apoE4 — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90 apoE4 ApT4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90 apoE4 — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    9 mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA haplogroup 0.38 0.025 98 vs. 117 — Chinese 90-100 years old J non-J - 18759861
    rs11279109 - APOB XbaI APOB — 0.001 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) — Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 — D - X+ Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    APOB XbaI − SI000565Q APOB — 0.006 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) — Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 X+ - Short X+ - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    rs11279109 - SI000565Q APOB — 0.05 191 (case) vs 53 — Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - S D - M Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    rs11279109 - APOB XbaI - SI000565Q APOB — 0.044 191 (case) vs 53 — Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ - Short I - X+ - Medium; D - X- - Long; D - X- - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    Haplogroup J — 0.38 0.025 98 vs 117 — Chinese 90–100 — — Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.387 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.141 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    14979C,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.781 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.549 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.319 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    9296T,8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.55 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    1107C,5178A,10400T mtDNA — 0.559 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    14569A,10400T mtDNA — 0.796 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA — 0.949 463 vs 1389 — Chinese >/=95 — — Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o

    Suggest a new study Report a database issue