Denigma

Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):

  • Variant effect: + -
    Longevity‑Associated (40)   No Age Effect (60)  
  • Study type: + -
    ‑ (3)   Candidate Region/Gene (70)   Complete Mitochondrial Genome (1)   Mitochondrial Haplogroup (30)  
  • Variant type: + -
    SNP (31)   Locus (2)   Haplotype (40)   STR (5)   Deletion (1)  
    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types


    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    1376G/T;1388G/A;95A/G;871G/A;1024C/T;1360C/T;392 G/T G6PD 6.30 0.013 173 total (see notes) — Chinese >80 — — Candidate Region/Gene 17077204
    rs1061581-rs1043618-rs2227956 — 4.51 0.016 191 vs 53 — Chinese >90 non A-G-C or non A-C-T haplotypes A-C-T Candidate Region/Gene 19840767
    rs1061581-rs1043618-rs2227956 — 3.46 0.025 191 vs 53 — Chinese >90 non A-G-C or non A-C-T haplotypes A-G-C Candidate Region/Gene 19840767
    rs4746720 SIRT1 2.10 0.0001 223 vs 277 — Chinese Average age 93 CC, TT CT Candidate Region/Gene 23450480
    mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 2.01 0.003 367 vs 371 — Chinese Mean age 94.4 non-F F Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21945877
    HLA-A phenotype HLA-A 1.95 0.002 201 vs 211 — Chinese 22 centenarians + 179 nonagenarians (mean age 93 ±1.04) A9 A30 Candidate Region/Gene 9147371
    FOXO3A, various FOXO3 1.67 0.0002 760 vs 1060 — Chinese 100+ — — Candidate Region/Gene 20884733
    rs3758391 SIRT1 1.45 0.026 246 vs 236 — Chinese 71.2±7.1 years T — Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    rs3758391 SIRT1 1.45 0.026 246 vs 236 — Chinese 60-90 — C Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    rs4946936 FOXO3 1.40 1.8e-05 761 vs 1056 350 vs 350 Chinese mean age 102.3 T C Candidate Region/Gene 19793722
    rs2802292 FOXO3 1.36 2.9e-05 761 vs 1056 350 vs 350 Chinese mean age 102.3 G T Candidate Region/Gene 19793722
    rs2253310 FOXO3 1.35 7.9e-05 761 vs 1056 350 vs 350 Chinese mean age 102.3 C G Candidate Region/Gene 19793722
    rs4746720 — 1.35 0.022 246 vs 236 — Chinese 60-90 — C Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    rs4746720 SIRT1 1.35 0.022 246 vs 236 — Chinese 71.2±7.1 years T — Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    XbaI APOB 1.30 0.03 191 (case) vs 53 — Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 — X+X+ Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    rs1042719 ADRB2 1.29 1.29 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 G C Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
    rs1042718 ADRB2 1.27 0.014 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 C A Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
    rs2755209 FOXO1 0.80 0.0046 761 vs 1056 350 vs 350 Chinese mean age 102.3 C T Candidate Region/Gene 19793722
    rs2755213 FOXO1 0.75 7.4e-05 761 vs 1056 350 vs 350 Chinese mean age 102.3 C T Candidate Region/Gene 19793722
    rs1042718-rs1042719 ADRB2 0.63 1.86e-05 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 G-C A-C Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
    HLA-C phenotype HLA-C 0.49 0.02 201 vs 211 — Chinese >93 Cw3, Cw6. Cw7 — Candidate Region/Gene 9147371
    rs3928306 MT-RNR2 0.49 0.027 98 vs 117 — Chinese 90–100 A — Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    9 mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA haplogroup 0.38 0.025 98 vs. 117 — Chinese 90-100 years old J non-J - 18759861
    Haplogroup J — 0.38 0.025 98 vs 117 — Chinese 90–100 — — Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    rs28359172 MT-ND5 0.30 0.003 98 vs 117 — Chinese 90–100 G — Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    • Page 1 of 5
    • 25 of 104 variants

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o

    Suggest a new study Report a database issue