Denigma

Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):

  • Variant effect: + -
    Longevity‑Associated (1027)   No Age Effect (543)  
  • Study type: + -
    GWAS (2)   ‑ (27)   Candidate Region/Gene (784)   Meta‑Analysis (38)   Complete Mitochondrial Genome (2)   Whole‑Genome Linkage Scan (1)   Genome‑Wide Association Study (710)   Mitochondrial Haplogroup (36)   Mitochondrial genome (3)  
  • Variant type: + -
    SNP (572)   Locus (5)   Haplotype (87)   Other (1)   STR (11)   Deletion (5)   CNV (1)    (1)   VNTR (1)  
    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types


    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.0212 60 vs 89 — African European Range: 20-59 — — Candidate Region/Gene 20569235
    APOE e2/e3/e4 APOE 4.40 0.02 179 — Finn Minimum age 104 e3, e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 11213279
    APOE polymorphism APOE — 0.0001 291 vs 589 — Finn Mean age 97.5 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 16487435
    APOE e2,e3,e4 APOE — 0.05 185 vs 486 — Finn Over 100 E4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 8018664
    APOE haplotype - rs1346044 APOE — 0.0001 175 vs 178 — Finn 100.8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 10069711
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.001 179 vs 615 — Finn Mean age 100 e4 e2, e3 Candidate Region/Gene 8018664
    rs3212948 ERCC1 — 0.1062 288 vs 554 — Calabrian 90+, median 92 — — Candidate Region/Gene 22576335
    APOE polymorphism APOE — 0.437 1408 cases — Brazilian 69.3 +/- 7.2 — — Candidate Region/Gene 17934638
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 — 0.05 297 vs 130 — Turkish, Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 — 0.05 297 vs 130 — Turkish, Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 — 0.05 60 vs 40 — Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G; −988 C/C, −800 G/G — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    rs4420638 APOE — 9.6e-08 4445 total (each a part of sibship of 2-5 siblings) — Caucasian, European 90 — — Genome-Wide Association Study 23286790
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.0005 318 vs 350 376 vs 506 American, Caucasian Mean age 100,8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 18034366
    rs2075650 TOMM40 2.07 2.36e-10 801 vs 914 253 vs 341 Caucasian Median age 104 G A Genome-Wide Association Study 22279548
    rs4802234 CEACAM16 1.36 9.22e-06 801 vs 914 — Caucasian Median age 104 A C Genome-Wide Association Study 22279548
    rs7246865 MYO9B 1.25 0.000164604 801 vs 914 — Caucasian Median age 104 A G Genome-Wide Association Study 22279548
    rs11086106 PGPEP1 1.77 0.000263101 801 vs 914 — Caucasian Median age 104 A G Genome-Wide Association Study 22279548
    rs1674159 NDUFA11 1.41 0.000520159 801 vs 914 — Caucasian Median age 104 G A Genome-Wide Association Study 22279548
    rs4420638 APOE — 9.6e-08 4445 total (each a part of sibship of 2-5 siblings) — Caucasian, European 90 — — Genome-Wide Association Study 23286790
    rs72533289 KIR2DS4 — 1.0 180 vs 180 — Irish Mean age 89 — — Candidate Region/Gene 15130674
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE 0.43 0.0006 114 vs 2071 — Irish >90 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 11470126
    KIR2DS3 haplotypes KIR2DS3 — 0.05 100 vs 100 — Irish Age range: 65-99 — — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    Apo C-I 1>2 Apo C-I — 0.05 282 vs 200 — British 84+ Apo C-I 2 — Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    rs1799782 XRCC1 — 0.658 430 vs 290 — British Mean age 70 — — Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    rs25487 XRCC1 — 0.51 430 vs 290 — British Mean age 70 — — Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    • Page 1 of 3
    • 25 of 67 variants

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o

    Suggest a new study Report a database issue