Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    -308G/A TNF 0.33 0.001 71 vs 99 Mexican 86.2 G Candidate Region/Gene 16269080
    -330T/G IL2 1.43 0.096 168 vs 214 Italian >99 Candidate Region/Gene 16518704
    -351A/G ESR1 0.05 148 vs 414 Polish 99.6-107.2; mean= 101.1±1.2 Candidate Region/Gene 20599431
    -397T/C ESR1 0.06 149 vs 414 Polish 99.6-107.2; mean= 101.1±1.3 Candidate Region/Gene 20599431
    -670A/G FAS 0.608 50 vs 86 Italian 100.8 ± 1.8 (100 to 106) Candidate Region/Gene 11965496
    1/s 5HTT 0.05 265 vs 225 Japanese 101.2 S Candidate Region/Gene 16095668
    10646A,10400T mtDNA 0.753 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    1082, 819, 592 IL-10 0.05 17 vs 105 Bulgarian Mean age 78.9 ACC/ATA GCC/ACC Candidate Region/Gene 15050300
    11 different snps tested, not all given. MTTP 1.0 1398 vs 777 British 77.9 ± 0.2 Candidate Region/Gene 17339647
    1107C,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.559 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    12358G,5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.058 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    12406A,3970T,12705C,10873T mtDNA 0.304 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    12811C,9824C,10400T mtDNA 0.587 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    13263G,7196A,10400T mtDNA 0.485 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    13590A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.43 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    1376G/T;1388G/A;95A/G;871G/A;1024C/T;1360C/T;392 G/T G6PD 6.30 0.013 173 total (see notes) Chinese >80 Candidate Region/Gene 17077204
    14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.796 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    14979C,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.781 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    15235G,8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.086 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    152C 0.004 25 vs 25 Turkish 90+ Mitochondrial genome 24792352
    15662G,8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.357 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    16 bp duplication in intron 3 (WT=no duplicaiton) TP53 0.59 66 vs 150 Italian 100.19±2.2 (95-105) Candidate Region/Gene 15195682
    1736G,10873T mtDNA 0.288 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    192 PON1 1.26 0.007 Italian: 308 vs 579; Northern Irish: 296 vs 296 Irish Italian: Mean age 100.8 +/- 2.1; Northern Irish: Mean age 89.8 +/- 5.7 Q Candidate Region/Gene 15050299
    192 (Q/R) PON1 1.30 0.007 308 vs 579 Italian, 296 vs 296 Irish Irish, Italian Italian 100.8 years, Irish 89.8 years Q Candidate Region/Gene 15050299

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue