Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    APOE4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over High E4 frequency Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    1376G/T;1388G/A;95A/G;871G/A;1024C/T;1360C/T;392 G/T G6PD 6.30 0.013 173 total (see notes) Chinese >80 Candidate Region/Gene 17077204
    rs1042718 ADRB2 1.27 0.014 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 C A Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
    rs1061581-rs1043618-rs2227956 4.51 0.016 191 vs 53 Chinese >90 non A-G-C or non A-C-T haplotypes A-C-T Candidate Region/Gene 19840767
    5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.018 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    HLA-C phenotype HLA-C 0.49 0.02 201 vs 211 Chinese >93 Cw3, Cw6. Cw7 Candidate Region/Gene 9147371
    rs4746720 1.35 0.022 246 vs 236 Chinese 60-90 C Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    rs4746720 SIRT1 1.35 0.022 246 vs 236 Chinese 71.2±7.1 years T Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    9 mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA haplogroup 0.38 0.025 98 vs. 117 Chinese 90-100 years old J non-J - 18759861
    Haplogroup J 0.38 0.025 98 vs 117 Chinese 90–100 Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    rs1061581-rs1043618-rs2227956 3.46 0.025 191 vs 53 Chinese >90 non A-G-C or non A-C-T haplotypes A-G-C Candidate Region/Gene 19840767
    rs3758391 SIRT1 1.45 0.026 246 vs 236 Chinese 71.2±7.1 years T Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    rs3758391 SIRT1 1.45 0.026 246 vs 236 Chinese 60-90 C Candidate Region/Gene 20633545
    4491A,3705G,10400T mtDNA 0.027 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    rs3928306 MT-RNR2 0.49 0.027 98 vs 117 Chinese 90–100 A Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
    XbaI APOB 1.30 0.03 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 X+X+ Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    rs429358 + rs7412 APOE 0.04 1236 vs 326 Chinese 60+ e4 non-e4 Candidate Region/Gene 9792194
    rs4646994 ACE 0.04 227 Uighur individuals, 108 Kazakh individuals, and 89 Han individuals Chinese Old: 59-70, Very old 90-113 I (insertion) Candidate Region/Gene 11773214
    VNTR DC-SIGNR 0.041 361 vs 342 Chinese >90 non-6/7 genotype 6/7 genotype Candidate Region/Gene 20003397
    rs11279109 - APOB XbaI - SI000565Q APOB 0.044 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ - Short I - X+ - Medium; D - X- - Long; D - X- - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    rs2266968 MAPK1 0.048 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
    rs4646994 ACE 0.05 4000 Chinese Minimum age 65 DD Candidate Region/Gene 22456784
    mt5178A ND2 0.05 95 vs 105 Chinese Mean age 76 АА Candidate Region/Gene 12384792
    rs11279109 - SI000565Q APOB 0.05 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - S D - M Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
    rs1061581 HSPA1B 0.05 191 vs 53 Chinese >90 A G Candidate Region/Gene 19840767

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue