Denigma

Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):

  • Variant effect: + -
    Longevity‑Associated « 
  • Study type: + -
    GWAS (2)   ‑ (8)   Candidate Region/Gene (344)   Meta‑Analysis (30)   Complete Mitochondrial Genome (1)   Genome‑Wide Association Study (607)   Mitochondrial Haplogroup (7)   Mitochondrial genome (3)  
  • Variant type: + -
    SNP (243)   Locus (3)   Haplotype (39)   STR (3)   Deletion (1)   CNV (1)    (1)   VNTR (1)  
    • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types


    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    APOE4 APOE — 0.013 35 vs 125 — Chinese 90 years or over High E4 frequency — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    APOE4 APOE — 0.71 106 vs 349 — American 70-79 (duration of study - 7 years) e4 — Candidate Region/Gene 16799145
    Apo C-I 1>2 Apo C-I — 0.05 282 vs 200 — British 84+ Apo C-I 2 — Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90 apoE4 ApT4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE — 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients — Chinese 90 apoE4 — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    rs5491 ICAM1 — 5e-66 5036 — American 28-70 TT, AT AA Genome-Wide Association Study 22174011
    APOE polymorphism APOE — 0.0001 291 vs 589 — Finn Mean age 97.5 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 16487435
    rs429358 + rs7412 APOE — 0.04 1236 vs 326 — Chinese 60+ e4 non-e4 Candidate Region/Gene 9792194
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 — 0.05 297 vs 130 — Turkish, Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 — 0.05 60 vs 40 — Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G; −988 C/C, −800 G/G — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    KIR2DS3 haplotypes KIR2DS3 — 0.05 100 vs 100 — Irish Age range: 65-99 — — Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    Lys751Gln ERCC2 — 0.017 149 vs 413 — Polish Mean age 101.1 homozygous (Lys/Lys, Gln/Gln) heterozygous (Lys/Gln) Candidate Region/Gene 19707883
    APOE haplotype - rs1346044 APOE — 0.0001 175 vs 178 — Finn 100.8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 10069711
    APOE polymorphism APOE — 0.02 80 vs 391 — Greek >80 epsilon4 — Candidate Region/Gene 17234815
    rs3220637 XRCC1 — 0.0005 430 (case) vs 290 — British Mean age 70 16 — Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    - APOC1 — 0.05 282 vs 200 — British 84 and over — — Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    epsilon2/3/4 APOE — 0.05 67 vs 125 — Italian 99+ (mean: 100±2) epsilon4 — Candidate Region/Gene 10643896
    E2 / E3 / E4 APOE — 1.2e-08 560 vs 560 — French centenarians 100th year or beyond, mean age 103.1 E4 — Candidate Region/Gene 11280044
    E4 APOE — 0.013 35 vs 125 — Chinese 90 years or over — — Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    rs4420638 APOE — 9.6e-08 4445 total (each a part of sibship of 2-5 siblings) — Caucasian, European 90 — — Genome-Wide Association Study 23286790
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.025 (150 m, 74 f) vs (121 m, 320 f) — Ashkenazi Jewish Mean age 75 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 15621215
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.001 179 vs 615 — Finn Mean age 100 e4 e2, e3 Candidate Region/Gene 8018664
    rs1800471 TGFB1 — 0.034 172 vs 247 — Italian 90-103 GC (genotype) — Candidate Region/Gene 15569360
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.009 1477 total — Italian 18-109 e4 non-e4 - 16896546
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE — 0.0005 318 vs 350 376 vs 506 American, Caucasian Mean age 100,8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 18034366
    • Page 1 of 2
    • 25 of 46 variants

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o

    Suggest a new study Report a database issue