Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 0.05 297 vs 130 Turkish, Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    TGFB1 haplotypes TGFB1 0.05 60 vs 40 Bulgarian Age range: 65-99 codon 10 C/C, codon 25 G/G; −988 C/C, −800 G/G Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    KIR2DS3 haplotypes KIR2DS3 0.05 100 vs 100 Irish Age range: 65-99 Candidate Region/Gene 21299522
    Arg156Arg ERCC2 0.05 149 vs 413 Polish Mean age 101.1 Candidate Region/Gene 19707883
    Asp312Asn ERCC2 0.05 149 vs 413 Polish Mean age 101.1 Candidate Region/Gene 19707883
    APOE polymorphism APOE 0.02 80 vs 391 Greek >80 epsilon4 Candidate Region/Gene 17234815
    - APOC1 0.05 282 vs 200 British 84 and over Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    rs3212948 ERCC1 0.1062 288 vs 554 Calabrian 90+, median 92 Candidate Region/Gene 22576335
    APOE4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over High E4 frequency Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    APOE4 APOE 0.71 106 vs 349 American 70-79 (duration of study - 7 years) e4 Candidate Region/Gene 16799145
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90+ apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    Apo C-I 1>2 Apo C-I 0.05 282 vs 200 British 84+ Apo C-I 2 Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    rs1799782 XRCC1 0.658 430 vs 290 British Mean age 70 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    rs25487 XRCC1 0.51 430 vs 290 British Mean age 70 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    rs72533289 KIR2DS4 1.0 180 vs 180 Irish Mean age 89 Candidate Region/Gene 15130674
    APOE polymorphism APOE 0.437 1408 cases Brazilian 69.3 +/- 7.2 Candidate Region/Gene 17934638
    rs3220637 XRCC1 0.0005 430 (case) vs 290 British Mean age 70 16 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    APOE polymorphism - HP1/2 common polymorphism APOE 0.013 200 (cases) vs 539 (initial) Italian >88 e4-H2 (haplotype) Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    HP1/2 common polymorphism HP 0.05 200 (cases) vs 539 (initial) (initial) Italian >88 Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
    epsilon2/3/4 APOE 0.05 67 vs 125 Italian 99+ (mean: 100±2) epsilon4 Candidate Region/Gene 10643896
    E2 / E3 / E4 APOE 1.2e-08 560 vs 560 French centenarians 100th year or beyond, mean age 103.1 E4 Candidate Region/Gene 11280044
    E4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    rs3745544 INSR 0.441 122 vs 122 Japanese mean age 106.8 Candidate Region/Gene 15582274
    rs3745546 INSR 0.168 122 vs 122 Japanese mean age 106.8 Candidate Region/Gene 15582274
    • Page 1 of 3
    • 25 of 52 variants

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue