Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE 0.75 0.005 2307 vs 764 American, Danish Mean age 60.2 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 23040522
    rs2075650 TOMM40 0.70 0.002 2307 vs 764 American, Danish Mean age 60.2 G A Candidate Region/Gene 23040522
    rs2708754 ZNF331 0.94 5.79e-05 5974 (RS), 3267 (CHS), 3136 (FHS), 4511 (ARIC), 3219 (AGES), 902 (inCHIANTI), 620 (BLSA), 1661 (HABC), 1717 (SHIP) Whitehall II - 6000 (UK), English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (UK), Religious Order Study - 1100, Memory and Ageing Project American A Genome-Wide Association Study 21782286
    rs10412199 ATCAY 0.91 3.02e-06 5974 (RS), 3267 (CHS), 3136 (FHS), 4511 (ARIC), 3219 (AGES), 902 (inCHIANTI), 620 (BLSA), 1661 (HABC), 1717 (SHIP) Whitehall II - 6000 (UK), English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (UK), Religious Order Study - 1100, Memory and Ageing Project American A Genome-Wide Association Study 21782286
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE 0.0005 318 vs 350 376 vs 506 American, Caucasian Mean age 100,8 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 18034366
    rs2075650 APOE 0.000527 1364 American, British Age range 50-108; mean age at death 80.2 C T Candidate Region/Gene 22445811
    rs3764650 ABCA7 0.135 1364 American, British Age range 50-108; mean age at death 80.2 C A Candidate Region/Gene 22445811
    rs3865444 CD33 0.442 1364 American, British Age range 50-108; mean age at death 80.2 C A Candidate Region/Gene 22445811
    APOE4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over High E4 frequency Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90+ apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 ApT4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    rs429358 + rs7412 APOE 0.04 1236 vs 326 Chinese 60+ e4 non-e4 Candidate Region/Gene 9792194
    E4 APOE 0.013 35 vs 125 Chinese 90 years or over Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
    VNTR DC-SIGNR 0.041 361 vs 342 Chinese >90 non-6/7 genotype 6/7 genotype Candidate Region/Gene 20003397
    Lys751Gln ERCC2 0.017 149 vs 413 Polish Mean age 101.1 homozygous (Lys/Lys, Gln/Gln) heterozygous (Lys/Gln) Candidate Region/Gene 19707883
    Arg156Arg ERCC2 0.05 149 vs 413 Polish Mean age 101.1 Candidate Region/Gene 19707883
    Asp312Asn ERCC2 0.05 149 vs 413 Polish Mean age 101.1 Candidate Region/Gene 19707883
    rs769449 APOE 0.70 0.018 1,089 vs 736 1,613 vs 1,104 Danish, German 92-93 Danish, 95–110 German G 22234866
    rs429358, rs7412 APOE 0.75 0.005 2307 vs 764 American, Danish Mean age 60.2 e4 e2 Candidate Region/Gene 23040522
    rs2075650 TOMM40 0.70 0.002 2307 vs 764 American, Danish Mean age 60.2 G A Candidate Region/Gene 23040522
    Apo C-I 1>2 Apo C-I 0.05 282 vs 200 British 84+ Apo C-I 2 Candidate Region/Gene 9105559
    rs1799782 XRCC1 0.658 430 vs 290 British Mean age 70 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    rs25487 XRCC1 0.51 430 vs 290 British Mean age 70 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718
    rs3220637 XRCC1 0.0005 430 (case) vs 290 British Mean age 70 16 Candidate Region/Gene 16518718

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue