Browse


polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
rs1042718-rs1042719 ADRB2 0.63 1.86e-05 384 vs 384 579 vs 644 Chinese Mean age 102.1±0.20 G-C A-C Candidate Region/Gene 23020224
rs11279109 - APOB XbaI APOB 0.001 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
APOB XbaI − SI000565Q APOB 0.006 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 X+ - Short X+ - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90+ apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 ApT4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
apoE haplotypes APOE 0.013 35 old vs 71 young vs 54 MI patients Chinese 90 apoE4 Candidate Region/Gene 11780357
rs1061581-rs1043618-rs2227956 4.51 0.016 191 vs 53 Chinese >90 non A-G-C or non A-C-T haplotypes A-C-T Candidate Region/Gene 19840767
5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.018 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9 mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA haplogroup 0.38 0.025 98 vs. 117 Chinese 90-100 years old J non-J - 18759861
Haplogroup J 0.38 0.025 98 vs 117 Chinese 90–100 Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
rs1061581-rs1043618-rs2227956 3.46 0.025 191 vs 53 Chinese >90 non A-G-C or non A-C-T haplotypes A-G-C Candidate Region/Gene 19840767
4491A,3705G,10400T mtDNA 0.027 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
rs11279109 - APOB XbaI - SI000565Q APOB 0.044 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ - Short I - X+ - Medium; D - X- - Long; D - X- - Medium Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
rs11279109 - SI000565Q APOB 0.05 191 (case) vs 53 Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - S D - M Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
12358G,5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.058 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
15235G,8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.086 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
5465C,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.105 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.117 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.141 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
3970T,12705C,10873T mtDNA 0.147 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
7600A,4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.153 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
1736G,10873T mtDNA 0.288 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
12406A,3970T,12705C,10873T mtDNA 0.304 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.311 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.319 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 25 of 40 variants