Browse


polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
mtDNA haplotype 0.0052 212 vs 275 Italian 100+ non-J haplogroups Mitochondrial Haplogroup 10463944
mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 2.01 0.003 367 vs 371 Chinese Mean age 94.4 non-F F Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21945877
mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 7.56 0.0015 74 vs 187 Amish >80 years non-X X Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21750925
mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 0.40 0.0003 74 vs 187 Amish >80 years J non-J Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21750925
mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 0.027 138 Spaniard Minimum age 85 non-J J Mitochondrial Haplogroup 18931934
mt9055A mtDNA 0.164 129 vs 100 Irish 80-97 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 11404057
Mitochondrial haplogroups mtDNA 0.001 225 (cases) vs 400 middle aged vs 257 infants Finn 90-91 H U, J, K Mitochondrial Haplogroup 12483296
C150T mtDNA L2 1.0 556 vs. 403 Chinese 90-108 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21262335
9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.311 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9824C,10400T mtDNA 0.955 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9296T,8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.55 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.319 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8684T,7196A,10400T mtDNA 0.457 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.117 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.549 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
7600A,4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.153 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
7196A,10400T mtDNA 0.847 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
5465C,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.105 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.018 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.387 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.949 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
4491A,3705G,10400T mtDNA 0.027 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
3970T,12705C,10873T mtDNA 0.147 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.141 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
1736G,10873T mtDNA 0.288 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 25 of 36 variants