Browse


polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
REN polymorphism - mtDNA mtDNA 3.27 0.006 157 Italian 100+ REN10 - mtDNA haplogroup H Candidate Region/Gene 11938442
rs915179-rs2485662-rs4641-rs1468772 LMNA 1.56 2.5e-05 873 vs 443 New England Centenarian Study (NECS) (N = 738), (ii) the Southern Italian Centenarian Study (SICS) (N = 905), (iii) France (N = 1103), and (iv) the Einstein Ashkenazi Longevity Study (N = 702) American, Caucasian Mean age 101.5 GTCT Candidate Region/Gene 22340368
rs1800896 - rs1800629 IL10 0.038 174 vs 224 Italian >100 GG-GG (only in men) Candidate Region/Gene 12676903
rs1800591-rs61733139 MTTP 0.61 197 vs 251 Dutch Mean age 93.8±3.1 Candidate Region/Gene 16611701
rs1800591-rs61733139 MTTP 0.46 655 vs 244 Dutch Mean age 87.5±3.1 Meta-Analysis 16611701
HP*1 F/S HP 0.82 0.33 1072 total Italian >88 Candidate Region/Gene 21147083
rs2234693 - rs2234693 ESR1 0.12 108 vs 85 Italian 90+ Candidate Region/Gene 20819792
APOE polymorphism APOE 0.437 1408 cases Brazilian 69.3 +/- 7.2 Candidate Region/Gene 17934638
rs11279109 - APOB XbaI APOB 0.001 191 (case) vs 53 (initial) Chinese > 90 baseline, Mean age 97 +/- 3 D - X+ Candidate Region/Gene 17393087
rs1061581 - rs1008438 - rs2227956 Hsp70Ba 0.55 0.015 168 cases Danish Mean age 92.8 +/- 0.4 G-C-T (haplotype) Candidate Region/Gene 20388090
HP1/2 common polymorphism HP 0.05 200 (cases) vs 539 (initial) (initial) Italian >88 Candidate Region/Gene 21703254
Haplogroup J 0.38 0.025 98 vs 117 Chinese 90–100 Candidate Region/Gene 18759861
5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.387 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.141 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
14979C,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.781 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.549 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.319 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9296T,8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.55 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
1107C,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.559 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.796 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.949 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
7600A,4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.153 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
9824C,10400T mtDNA 0.955 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
12811C,9824C,10400T mtDNA 0.587 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
7196A,10400T mtDNA 0.847 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
  • Page 1 of 4
  • 25 of 87 variants