Longevity Variant Database

Narrow results by variant, study, or associated fields (e.g. gene symbol ADRB2):

Use ontology terms to further narrow results (e.g. aging, insulin, etc.):


  • Variant type: + -

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 X Y MT
    Export results (Download)

    Populations | Study Types | Variant Types



    LVDB_word_cloud.png
    logo.png
    variants.jpg
    polymorphism factor odds ratio pvalue initial number replication number Population age of cases shorter lived allele longer lived allele study type reference
    mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 0.40 0.0003 74 vs 187 Amish >80 years J non-J Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21750925
    Mitochondrial haplogroups mtDNA 0.001 225 (cases) vs 400 middle aged vs 257 infants Finn 90-91 H U, J, K Mitochondrial Haplogroup 12483296
    mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 7.56 0.0015 74 vs 187 Amish >80 years non-X X Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21750925
    mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 2.01 0.003 367 vs 371 Chinese Mean age 94.4 non-F F Mitochondrial Haplogroup 21945877
    mtDNA haplotype 0.0052 212 vs 275 Italian 100+ non-J haplogroups Mitochondrial Haplogroup 10463944
    5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.018 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    mtDNA haplogroups mtDNA 0.027 138 Spaniard Minimum age 85 non-J J Mitochondrial Haplogroup 18931934
    4491A,3705G,10400T mtDNA 0.027 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    12358G,5417A,10873T mtDNA 0.058 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    15235G,8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.086 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    5465C,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.105 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.117 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.141 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    3970T,12705C,10873T mtDNA 0.147 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    7600A,4833G,14569A,10400T mtDNA 0.153 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    mt9055A mtDNA 0.164 129 vs 100 Irish 80-97 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 11404057
    1736G,10873T mtDNA 0.288 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    12406A,3970T,12705C,10873T mtDNA 0.304 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.311 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    8964T,8020A,3010A,5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.319 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    15662G,8584A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.357 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    5178A,10400T mtDNA 0.387 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    13590A,9bp-deletion,10873T mtDNA 0.43 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    8684T,7196A,10400T mtDNA 0.457 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    13263G,7196A,10400T mtDNA 0.485 463 vs 1389 Chinese >/=95 Mitochondrial Haplogroup 19641616
    • Page 1 of 2
    • 25 of 36 variants

    The Longevity Variant Database (LVDB) is a collaborative effort to catalogue all published genetic variants relevant to human longevity.

    The project is directed by the Health Extension Research Foundation [http://www.healthextension.co/about/], and the online content is managed by the members of the Global Computing Initiative.

    LVDB is driven by an international collaboration of scientists, programmers, and volunteers, including Joe Betts-LaCroix, Kristen Fortney, Daniel Wuttke, Eric K. Morgen, Nick Schaum, John M. Adams, Jessica Choi, Barry Goldberg, Amir Levine, Maria Litovchenko, Aiste Narkeviciute, Emily Quist, Navneet Ramesh, Justin Rebo, Dmitri Shytikov, and Jimi Vyas. o


    Suggest a new study Report a database issue